Lawmakers return to the State House following a break on Thursday, March 6, 2025. (Photo by Dana Wormald/New Hampshire Bulletin)
As recent data prompts concern about childhood lead poisoning in the state, the New Hampshire House shot down two bills last week aimed at addressing the issue.
Lawmakers voted, 202-167, to indefinitely postpone House Bill 724. This bill would have lowered the childhood blood lead action level — the exposure level that triggers an investigation from the Department of Health and Human Services — from 5 micrograms per deciliter to 3.5. It would have also required the agency to inspect other units when one in a multi-unit residential building has a lead hazard.
It also would have established a legal standard — called a rebuttable presumption — that would presume residences built prior to 1978 contain “lead based substances” unless an inspector has determined otherwise. It would have also mandated that municipal building permits include the Environmental Protection Agency license numbers for those renovating, repairing, or painting buildings built before 1978. (1978 is the year a federal ban on lead in residential paint came into effect.)
House members also rejected, 202-169, House Bill 756. This measure would have added to law that health forms submitted when children 6 and under enter public school or day care should include the result of at least one blood lead level test, with certain exemptions. If they didn’t, the school or day care would have had to notify the parents or guardians of the requirement and provide education materials on the importance of testing and the dangers of lead poisoning.
The moves come months after a report raised concerns about childhood lead poisoning in the state. In 2023, 1,142 children in the state had levels of lead in their blood “high enough to impair their ability to think, learn, and concentrate,” according to a state report published in December. This was the highest number found in the past five years of data.
Though state law requires that children be tested for lead at ages 1 and 2, the report showed the state falling short. Among children 12 to 23 months included in the 2023 data, 24% had not undergone the required testing, while 31% of children ages 24 to 35 months had not been tested.
The report also found that one in 10 children on Medicaid had elevated blood lead levels, almost twice the rate of other children.
Lead paint and dust in older residences account for 70% of U.S. children’s lead exposure, followed by 15% each from lead in consumer products and drinking water, according to the report.
The residential exposure is especially relevant in New Hampshire, where slightly more than half of housing units were built before 1980 and at least 32,350 young children live in residences with lead paint, according to the report.
Proponents of the bill aimed at schools and day cares hoped it would help raise the state’s testing numbers.
“Regrettably, currently significant numbers of children are not tested at all,” said Rep. Trinidad Tellez, a Hooksett Democrat, on the House floor. “Given the potentially devastating impacts of lead on children’s developing brains, and the very concerning low numbers of 1- and 2-year-old children currently tested for blood lead levels, this bill provides an important stop-gap opportunity for increasing the blood testing of infants and children.”
But Rep. Jim Kofalt, a Wilton Republican, argued it was an “unnecessary and burdensome bill.”
“This bill adds a step to the process of enrolling a child in school or day care,” Kofalt said. “It doesn’t actually add additional lead testing requirements. We already require children to be tested at age 1 and then again at age 2.”
The Conservation Law Foundation denounced the House’s vote to reject HB 727, the multi-part proposal that included the housing-related measures. The group called the bill “crucial” legislation that would have helped to protect children from lead exposure in their homes.
“As a mother and environmental advocate, I am deeply troubled by the House’s vote,” said Heidi Trimarco, a staff attorney with the foundation, in a statement. “Lead poisoning is a silent thief that robs children of their futures. Our lawmakers had the power to better protect our kids — and instead, a majority of them turned their backs on the families who need help the most.”