Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Jonesboro, presents an amendment to the Arkansas State Library’s fiscal year 2026 appropriation bill to the Joint Budget Committee’s Special Language subcommittee on Tuesday, March 18, 2025. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)
A subcommittee of Arkansas’ Joint Budget Committee on Tuesday rejected a proposed ban on the Arkansas State Library funding local public libraries affiliated with the American Library Association.
The State Library is responsible for disbursing funds to libraries statewide. Under the proposed amendment to House Bill 1127, the State Library would not have been allowed to “budget, allocate, or expend any funding to any library” that is affiliated with the ALA, including as a member; refers to the ALA in any of its official documents; or “makes payments or grants of any kind” to the national nonprofit during fiscal year 2026.
Libraries that use state funds for ALA-related activities would have been required to return the funds to the State Library.
Amendments to appropriations bills need eight affirmative votes to pass Joint Budget’s Special Language subcommittee. Chairman Rep. Lee Johnson, R-Greenwood, said there were not enough votes for the HB 1127 amendment.
Several subcommittee members voted against the proposal, and members of both political parties expressed their concerns to Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Jonesboro, who added the amendment to the bill last week.
The ALA is a national nonprofit trade association that advocates for public libraries and helps them secure grant funding. It also accredits master’s of library science degree programs.
Sullivan repeated his criticism of the portion of the ALA’s Library Bill of Rights that access to libraries should not be restricted based on a person’s age. Far-right conservatives nationwide who object to the public availability of certain content have claimed this is proof that the ALA believes in forcing content about sexual activity and LGBTQ+ topics onto children.
ALA’s climate change resources and stated commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion are proof the organization has “an agenda,” Sullivan said. He also said the State Library Board didn’t seem to understand that the Legislature has power over its ability to distribute funds.
Arkansas senator continues mission to eliminate State Library Board, cites unfulfilled bargain
“If we’re going to distribute funds to libraries that have a policy that we will not withhold any information… from anyone regardless of their age, and if our State Library Board and our State Library, county libraries and regional libraries can’t develop a policy that states that, we’ve got a big problem,” he said.
Sullivan has vowed to eliminate the State Library Board, which refused both last month and last week to disavow the ALA. The board approved a motion to create “non-binding policies to protect children” in libraries while honoring First Amendment freedoms and libraries’ material selection policies, but Sullivan said Friday that this was not enough to ensure the board’s survival.
He introduced Senate Bill 184 in February to eliminate both the State Library Board and the Arkansas Education Television Commission, which oversees Arkansas PBS, and transfer their powers to the state Department of Education. The bill passed the Senate Feb. 17 and has yet to be heard by a House committee.
Negotiations with the PBS commission chairman led Sullivan to decide not to dissolve it, and he said he has drafted an amendment to SB 184 removing the Arkansas Education Television Commission. As of Tuesday afternoon, the amendment had not been posted on the Legislature’s bill monitoring website.
Sullivan told the JBC subcommittee that he planned to file a new bill that would fulfill the purpose of the HB 1127 amendment if it did not pass. The bill had not been filed as of Tuesday afternoon.
Technicalities
Sen. Jimmy Hickey, R-Texarkana, said he found it “counterintuitive” that the proposed amendment banned funding libraries with any and all references to the ALA in measures passed by their governing boards.
“Let’s just say that one of these boards, if this were to pass, were to go in and say, ‘We cannot make a reference to the American Library Association’… then they’ve made a reference to the American Library Association in an official document,” Hickey said.
Sullivan said he understood Hickey’s point but would “leave it at that.” He also said he had not heard from any librarians saying the amendment would put their funding at risk.
However, librarians in Sen. Jonathan Dismang’s district have contacted him with concerns that the fine points of the language of the appropriation amendment could jeopardize their funding, he told Sullivan.
“I don’t think any member could read this language and understand what the outcome is all at once,” the Searcy Republican said. “I may be wrong, but… I’m saying that gives me concern. You may have libraries, doing everything the way that you think they should be doing it, that could be tripped up by the way that this is written and lose their state funding.”
Dismang said he agreed with Sullivan that “sexually explicit materials” should not be within minors’ reach, but Sullivan said he was skeptical of that statement based on Dismang’s concerns.
“If libraries have in their policy that we adhere to the American Library Association policy, [that] policy disagrees with what we just said,” Sullivan said.
Dismang also said he was concerned about the amendment’s exception for libraries to pay for staff professional development from the ALA if the programming “does not conflict with state law.”
“Obviously there are some good things [about the ALA] or we wouldn’t have carved out an exception,” Dismang said.
Act 242 of 2025 removes the state’s requirement for public library directors in Arkansas to hold a master’s degree “from an accredited American Library Association program,” and allows someone with “work experience in the field of library operations” but without a master’s degree to run a library with approval from its local governing board.
Sullivan sponsored Act 242, which became law March 4, and said it will give communities “local control” over who runs their libraries.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.