As the housing debate rages statewide, one of the issues seldom addressed is that of “free parking.”
It’s one thing to increase housing density to hopefully bring us more affordable domiciles, but we have to remember that parking must be part of the equation… properly managed and priced.
Critics argue that each parking space in a new development takes up about 325 sq. feet. That means two or three spaces could require as much land as a studio apartment or small store. And the cost of parking just adds to construction costs: as much as $10,000 per space on a surface lot, $50,000 on a parking structure and $100,000 in an underground lot.
Consider Bridgeport where as many as 200 homeless are living on the streets. To encourage more housing development, in 2022 the city’s Planning and Zoning Commission eliminated minimum on-site parking for new developments. That has many fearing street battles over limited curbside parking if empty lots turn into multi-family apartments without built-in, on-site parking.
On one site on East Main Street a New York City-based developer wants to construct 74 apartments (and street-level retail space) in a five-story building with no parking. On average that would mean 60 – 80 new cars in the neighborhood.
Of course, if developments were to be located near existing public transportation, residents wouldn’t need as many cars to get to school, work and shopping. But that’s a siting and transit funding issue.
Urban planner Donald Shoup of UCLA (who died recently at age 86) reported that including parking in housing in Los Angeles increased apartment rents by $200–$500 per month due to added construction and financing costs.
As he wrote in his seminal book, The High Cost of Free Parking (2005), free parking is never really free. Building more parking, like widening highways, just encourages more use of cars, adding to the problem.
In downtown Hartford it’s estimated that 22% of land is dedicated to parking. And that’s just surface lots (costing drivers $100 per month), not parking structures ($200 per month) or street parking ($240 per month). Compare those costs to a monthly bus pass on CTtransit ($63) or CTRail ($267 for unlimited rides from/to New Haven).
Look at your own town or city. Being selfish, we all want parking right in front of our destination… as close as possible to the front door. Ever notice when you go someplace new, like a theater or event space, their websites give driving directions but seldom show mass transit options?
None of the solutions to this parking problem will be popular:
Price parking at market rates: Let the demand (and limited supply) determine the actual cost of parking. If the lot is always full (forcing people to drive around), it’s too cheap.
Charge for parking at work or school: Rather than employers eating the cost, make their employee drivers pay a share. That would right-size the true cost of driving vs taking mass transit. Reward employees who don’t drive by subsidizing their transit costs, exactly like Connecticut Department of Transportation’s CTpass program does.
As I say… not popular, but worth thinking about.