Idaho state Rep. Britt Raybould, R-Rexburg, speaks from the House floor at the State Capitol building on Jan. 23, 2024. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)
An Idaho legislator is seeking the public’s feedback on a new proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution that would give voters the power to approve a new local option sales and use tax.
Rep. Britt Raybould, R-Rexburg, sponsored House Joint Resolution 5 and a companion bill, House Bill 375.
“As we have heard over the course of our service here … there has been interest expressed from our local communities about having a more general local use tax made available,” Raybould said.
A new local sales and use tax would be a new tax for specific products or services in a specific city or county that would be put forward for local voters to approve or deny.
If voters approved a local sales and use tax, the tax would only be for specific products or services listed and only for local communities that vote to approve the new tax. The new tax would be in addition to the state’s existing 6% sales tax.
The House Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to introduce both bills on Thursday morning, and both bills are available to the public on the Idaho Legislature’s website, or by clicking on the highlighted bill number near the beginning of this article.
Representative hopes to start a conversation about new local sales and use tax proposals
Raybould told legislators she isn’t trying to pass House Joint Resolution 5 or House Bill 375 this year. Instead, Raybould said she put the proposals forward to circulate them publicly, gather feedback from Idahoans about her proposals and start a conversation.
“I want these ideas to be out there so that during the interim there can be ongoing conversations and proposals brought forward, because I felt that the time is ripe to resolve what this issue is going to look like going forward,” Raybould told legislators Thursday at the Idaho State Capitol in Boise.
House Joint Resolution 5 is a proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution that would ask Idaho voters to decide whether to give counties or municipalities the option to authorize a new local sales and use tax within its jurisdiction. Under the proposal, the maximum levy rate would be 2% and be limited to a maximum of four years.
Even if statewide voters approve the proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution, no sales and use tax could be imposed unless it was also approved by a majority of voters within the jurisdiction during an general election taking place in an even numbered year.
Under the proposal, any proposed local option sales and use tax up for election would be required to include a detailed description of the product or services that would be subject to the tax, as well as a description of how the money collected through the new tax would be used.
Raybould said a new local option sales and use tax might be appealing to Idaho cities or counties that experience an influx of tourists and want to establish a local sales and use tax that targets products or services related to tourism, but doesn’t really affect local residents.
“For instance, if I wanted to have a tax on hotels, I could establish that for the purposes of this particular local option tax, that it would apply to nights spent in a hotel,” Raybould said. “You have to have an intended purpose. This can’t just be for general maintenance and operations, there would need to be a specific purpose outlined.”
Proposals could replace new auditorium districts in Idaho
The bill also includes what Raybould described as a trade-off. If the proposed amendment passes, Raybould said it would phase out any existing sales or use taxes available to cities and counties, such as an auditorium district.
According to the Idaho State Tax Commission, there are three existing auditorium districts in place in Idaho. Those auditorium districts include:
- The Greater Boise Auditorium District, or GBAD
- The Idaho Falls Auditorium District
- The Pocatello Auditorium District
“That would be the trade, essentially, is that for a local option tax with flexibility that you would do the trade off with, potentially, like an auditorium district,” Raybould said.
Raybould said the idea is that the new local option sales and use tax would eventually replace auditorium districts if her proposals pass.
The House Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to introduce Raybould’s proposals, but several legislators had questions or concerns about phasing out existing auditorium districts.
“I do want to make sure that we really talk this through, because I’m not sure that something that could cause an auditorium district to go away or prevent other communities from creating one is in the best long term interests of the community,” said Rep. Steve Berch, a Boise Democrat who used to serve on the board of an auditorium district.
Raybould said existing auditorium districts would be allowed to remain in place until their stated expiration date.
“Whatever date exists on an existing auditorium district, they would be able to continue through the end of that period, but going forward the formation of any new district, assuming the amendment passed, would no longer be supported under the combination of these two bills,” Raybould said.
Introducing House Joint Resolution 5 and House Bill 375 clears the way for both proposals to return to the House Revenue and Taxations Committee for full public hearing. However, neither proposal is expected to pass this legislative session.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.