Voter guide 2024: Republican state House primary races Q&A

(Mike Sweeney for Colorado Newsline)

Registered voters in Colorado should have received their ballots in the mail for the June 25 primary, which includes races for Congress, the state Legislature, the University of Colorado Board of Regents and other local positions.

Voters can contact their county clerk if they have not received their ballot or check the online BallotTrax system. They can also visit the secretary of state’s website to make a plan to vote in person ahead of or on Election Day. Ballots need to be received by the county clerk by 7 p.m. on that day, so voters should make a plan to mail their ballot at least eight days ahead of time or drop it off in person.

In a primary election, same-party candidates compete to advance as their party’s candidate in the general election in November. In Colorado, registered Republican voters cast ballots in the Republican primaries, Democratic voters cast ballots in the Democratic primaries, and unaffiliated voters cast Republican or Democratic ballots, but not both.

Voters can find their state legislative districts at the General Assembly’s website.

There are 10 contested Republican primaries for seats in the state House of Representatives, a mix of incumbents defending their positions against challengers and new candidates vying for seats that are open due to term limits. Click on a link below to jump to a specific race:

House District 11
House District 12
House District 20
House District 21
House District 43
House District 45
House District 46
House District 58
House District 63
House District 65

Colorado Newsline sent surveys to every candidate in a contested primary. The questions are identical, except for one extra question for an incumbent or current state lawmaker and one extra question for a candidate challenging an incumbent.

Colorado Newsline asked a question about ballot initiatives related to property taxes. This year, lawmakers approved a bill aimed at softening the rise in property taxes for homeowners. That law will not take effect, however, if voters approve a ballot measure to cut them further this November. Initiative 50, a property tax revenue cap, and Initiative 108, an assessment rate cut, will be on the ballot if petitioners gather enough signatures.

Candidates’ answers might have been edited for length or clarity and appear in alphabetical order within their race. The candidate’s photo, age, city of residence, and occupation are included when available.

House District 11 is centered in Longmont. Rep. Karen McCormick, a Democrat, was reelected to the seat in 2022 with about 70% of the vote. She is running for reelection.

If elected, what would be your top three priorities during the 2025 legislative session?

GOON: Size/overreach of government, taxes, mental health.

REEVES: My priority will not necessarily be to pass legislation on every issue I feel strongly about. There has been a mad rush in recent years to pass as many bills as possible, sometimes overlapping previous legislation. The 705 bills introduced during the last session were far too many, in my opinion. I believe in a smaller and less intrusive government. Therefore, my first actions might include repealing former legislation, especially if it could be classified as wasteful spending. My priorities are protecting the life of the preborn, putting a stop to crime, and keeping the Bill of Rights from being marginalized in Colorado.

What do residents in your district say is the community’s biggest issue, and how will you work to address it?

GOON: My race is driven by sharing other viewpoints rather than the pursuit of victory in a clearly Democrat district. I firmly believe that our government has grown too large and we have lost touch with making decisions for ourselves and letting the consequences happen. Instead, we rely on the government — composed of imperfect individuals — to make choices for us. We want them to approve of our choices in the form of licensing, from car mechanics to interior designers. We expect the government to handle charitable needs that we should support as good people through donations or tithes. We want them to keep us safe when we should be deciding our levels of risk vs. reward. As we saw during COVID, this allowed the abuse of power. We were betrayed and I am grateful that the truth is coming out now. I hope that people can extrapolate further and realize that while those in government may believe they are helping, they are ultimately taking and redirecting your resources to serve their own priorities.

REEVES: Longmont residents say crime is our biggest issue, often in conjunction with talking about our open borders. People want to be safe, and that is one of the valid roles of government. We need to work with our DAs, law enforcement, and possibly even border patrol in the southern states to reach satisfactory solutions. Allowing those who have committed crimes such as murder, human trafficking, fentanyl sales, and theft right back out on the street, to repeat the same crime, is not working for our residents. Sometimes we just need to enforce existing law. However, change in legislation will be needed also, considering it is currently a misdemeanor to have possession of enough fentanyl to kill at least 500 people. This will require education and collaboration, because bills introduced to address this situation have thus far been unsuccessful.

The Legislature passed a few key land use bills this year aimed at increasing housing development. What is the state’s role, if any, to increase development and density to address the affordable housing stock issue?

GOON: The state should have no role in increasing development and density other than to reduce the number of regulations required for development. Density is a function of local government and not the state. People make decisions in their lives based on local ordinances and HOA rules. For the state to interfere without compensation in these types of changes is definitely overreaching their intended authority.

REEVES: The state Legislature should not have a role in determining zoning and development for the entire state. These decisions are best made locally, at the county or city level. Each community is unique and will make the best decisions for themselves. When development is unhindered by state regulation, supply and demand operates freely.

What is the state’s role in mitigating the effects of climate change on citizens and what specific environmental policies would you support in the Legislature?

GOON: Climate is beyond human control in Colorado. My focus would be on reducing pollution to mitigate the impact of dirty air and contaminated soil on Colorado citizens. By involving the state, once again the government chooses winners and losers. With reduced interference, free markets may come up with even better ideas than the solar and wind that is currently being subsidized and favored.

REEVES: Climate ebbs and flows as it has always done. There is no climate crisis. Pollution can be an issue and should be dealt with separately, when needed. Exploring alternative energy is good, but mandating it before its time only increases costs, and transfers wealth from one sector to another. This is not something the government should be involved in. In a free market society, affordable solutions will be found.

How can the Legislature most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for Coloradans across all backgrounds, including income levels and homeowner/renter status?

GOON: The state Legislature can reduce its involvement in our lives in all aspects but particularly in business. Starting and owning a business is a powerful way to build wealth, yet many feel stuck in dead-end jobs due to excessive government requirements. From health insurance that is greatly overpriced for individuals due to its link with employers to accountants and lawyers needed to keep abreast of everything that comes out of the legislature, the burden to employers are an obstruction to new businesses. All of our inboxes are overflowing. Even those not in business can imagine the challenge of keeping up on new statutes from the secretary of state’s office. We all are relieved when the Legislature adjourns, only to await the next round of regulations.

REEVES: The Colorado Legislature can most effectively address cost-of-living concerns by providing an environment in which businesses thrive. In a strong economy, everyone benefits. Less government intervention and lower taxes will mean that businesses prosper and are able to hire more employees, along with paying higher wages. We should not be a nanny state, giving too many handouts, and taking away the incentive to work. The state can provide safety and security, so the people can focus on other things. The beauty of capitalism is the pride in accomplishment that people feel when they are able to provide for themselves and their families.

Do you support deeper property tax cuts through ballot initiatives this year that would override the Legislature’s property tax work from the most recent session?

GOON: I do. The only chance the people have to reduce the size of government is to reduce the amount of money the state has to use for its programs. Sadly, our state would rather use tax money for pet projects vs things required by the state such as maintaining roads and bridges or focusing limited funds on the justice system here.

REEVES: Yes, because the recent property tax bill did not go far enough with reductions, and will actually result in an increase in some instances. Government is meant to serve the people, and the people have the final say.

Many Coloradans are listing their top issue this election year as democracy and good governance through the statewide Voter Voices project. Do you find any common ground with members of the opposite party, and how important is bipartisanship in your political philosophy?

GOON: I do not find a lot of common ground with Democrats. Their approach to governing is to use people’s money to fix the priorities they have. These priorities may not be the priorities of those whose money is being taken. Instead those in government focus on their reelection prospects vs. their main obligations. I believe people want to fix their own problems and address their own concerns with their own resources. With minimal government interference, most people can leverage their ingenuity to enhance their own resources. The state government should uphold a system of justice and the state’s infrastructure. I can even see the state government assisting in funding a safety net for emergency support for those in true need but nothing more.

REEVES: Discussion is good, and collaboration is possible, when both sides are willing to listen. For example, when two groups are seeking the same result, but have differing opinions about how to achieve that result, compromise can be successful. Also, compassion brings people together. Some discussions will not be about who is right, but about what is right. In the end, it’s really about what is best for the people.

House District 12 includes the eastern suburbs of Boulder including Niwot, Superior, Louisville and Lafayette. A vacancy committee appointed incumbent Rep. Kyle Brown, a Democrat, in January 2023. Tracey Bernett, the representative that Brown replaced, won the seat with 77% of the vote in 2022.

Neither Mahler nor Milliman returned a response. 

House District 20 includes northern parts of El Paso County including Monument, Black Forest and the Air Force Academy. Current Rep. Don Wilson, a Republican, won the seat unopposed in 2022. Wilson is not seeking another term.

If elected, what would be your top three priorities during the 2025 legislative session?

CALDWELL: I’m a law-and-order candidate. Colorado was recently ranked the #3 “unsafest” state in the nation. I support initiatives and legislation such as “Truth in Sentencing” where violent offenders have to serve out a higher percentage of their sentences. Currently, the average violent offender is not even doing half of their prison sentence, getting released, and oftentimes re-offending. The ones who suffer are the innocent people in the community who are the victims of these crimes.

Many in HD20 are struggling financially right now. Between gas hikes, property taxes, food prices, and other costs, people are having to make difficult financial decisions. This is especially true for young people just starting on their own and older people on fixed incomes. I’m in favor of legislation that works to cut these costs by lowering taxes, eliminating fees, and reducing burdensome regulations.

Parental rights are under unprecedented attack at the Capitol right now. Bills like HB24-1039, the “Non-legal Name Change” bill, are a direct assault on our rights as parents to be involved in our children’s lives. It places the government between parents and our kids. I will oppose any legislation that infringes on our rights as parents.

LUPO: Protecting our youth and families is my biggest priority which incorporates securing parental rights, putting more money back in the wallets of Coloradans, securing medical freedom, standing firm in Coloradans’ ability to carry out their constitutional rights and right to defend their families, and restoring our education system to teaching core subjects and away from radical ideology.

Colorado’s Legislature has continually expanded government, added taxes and fees and increased regulations hurting our local economies and small businesses. Numerous times, the Legislature has trampled on First and Second Amendment rights of Coloradans and prioritized the environment over the economy and public safety. Colorado is now the fourth worst state when it comes to crime, and we must strengthen our punishment for violent crimes, human trafficking and sex crimes. Colorado must end its support of illegal immigrants and remove its Sanctuary State status.

What do residents in your district say is the community’s biggest issue, and how will you work to address it?

CALDWELL: While property taxes are a major issue in HD20, especially with our citizens on fixed incomes, the number one issue I hear from constituents is their concerns about illegal immigration. They see the problems it’s causing in Denver and do not want it exported from Denver to our communities. It’s unfair to our tax-paying citizens of HD20 to use their state tax money to fund those who came here illegally while issues our tax money is meant for aren’t properly addressed.

Colorado needs to end its sanctuary status and let federal authorities work with local authorities to address the problem. Denver’s programs of subsidizing financially, housing, schooling, and feeding illegal immigrants incentivize those who come to the United States illegally to travel to Colorado specifically. It’s impacting our state and local budgets, as well as putting a strain on resources and systems like our schools. There’s a correct way to immigrate here and an incorrect way. Our taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize and incentivize coming here the incorrect way.

LUPO: Many residents are concerned about rising crime, drug use and illegal immigration. I will work to toughen sentences for crimes that continue to harm our communities, families and businesses. I will fight against Colorado’s Sanctuary State status, and work to lessen the impact of illegal immigration on our communities and pocketbooks. Illegal immigration has taken resources away from our residents to give to an expanding social services budget.

The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that illegal immigration costs each Colorado Household $851 per year. That is money that is drawn away from education and public services. We already know that our jails are overcrowded and we lack sheriffs and police officers, and the resources expended on illegal immigration comes at a drastic cost to our lawful citizens.

The Legislature passed a few key land use bills this year aimed at increasing housing development. What is the state’s role, if any, to increase development and density to address the affordable housing stock issue?

CALDWELL: I’m a strong proponent of local control and private property rights. The best people to make decisions for land use in their communities are the citizens of that community. There is a significantly better chance of local elected officials adhering to their citizens’ desires than the governor or bureaucrats in Denver even listening to our concerns. What is good for Boulder or Denver is not necessarily what is good for Monument, Black Forest, or Falcon, Colorado.

LUPO: I believe in a free market economy which for decades has dictated market cost and availability. There is an estimated shortfall of 100,000 homes in Colorado, and an estimated 278,000 illegal immigrants. The solution is multi-faceted, but also has to take into account the situation as a whole. Cost of building materials is through the roof, skilled trade workers are declining, employment costs are increasing yearly, and property taxes have seen a drastic increase of 29% in just one year.

The state has a history of interfering with the free market economy which has led to many of these issues. History has shown that rising regulations means a larger fiscal burden for everyone. Inflation rates have peaked at some of the highest in history, costing Coloradan households an additional $28,991 since 2020 according to the Common Sense Institute. While some benefits may exist from legislative action on housing and development, Colorado will not be able to continue to grow at a rate sustainable for Colorado families as immigrants are pouring in by the busload.

Editor’s Note: Many sources estimate there are about 160,000 undocumented immigrants who live and work in Colorado. 

What is the state’s role in mitigating the effects of climate change on citizens and what specific environmental policies would you support in the Legislature?

CALDWELL: There’s unfortunately been a myth in recent years that Republicans don’t care about the environment. I couldn’t disagree more. Many Republicans around our state rely on the health of the environment more so than others, such as our farmers, ranchers, hunters, guides, and others. You’ll often find some of the most ardent conservationists in the entire state within those groups of people. We all want a clean and healthy environment for our kids, our grandkids, and our future generations.

What we are seeing at the legislature currently are unrealistic attempts to force a “Green New Deal” style agenda by some of the more radical legislators. Bills like the one to end all new oil and gas leases by 2032 are neither realistic nor practical. The result of such initiatives would likely be an astronomical increase in energy prices and hurt the common man and woman who are already struggling.

As technology develops over time, we’ll find cleaner and better ways without sacrificing the energy use our state needs. These new alternative technologies will likely take decades to develop and implement. Legislation that presumes it will happen overnight simply because it is a law is something an unserious person would propose.

LUPO: Until climate alarmists shore up their false claims and faulty research, and legitimate information on climate change is presented, the state should not move on regulations and restrictions that greatly harm manufacturing, automobile and energy sectors. The ridiculousness of requiring electric vehicles and electric lawnmowers, will only put a further dent in the financial stability of families. Research has also shown that the CO2 reduction in manufacturing and use of electric vehicles is only a small decrease compared to gasoline vehicles. Moreover the environmental toll of mining nickel, cobalt and lithium is more disastrous to the environment than continuing on the path of gasoline vehicles.

How can the Legislature most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for Coloradans across all backgrounds, including income levels and homeowner/renter status?

CALDWELL: When I speak with HD20 residents from all different income levels, their concern is the inflated costs of everything compared to just a few years ago. At a time when they need more money in their pockets, they get hit with some new fee or regulation that increases their costs.

The failure of the Democrat majority to pass a replacement for the Gallagher Amendment repeal only made their financial realities worse. There were promises to pass legislation to curb this dramatic increase in property taxes, but after four years since the Gallagher Amendment repeal, there hasn’t been any real relief. People on fixed incomes are some of the hardest impacted that I talk to.

Our state budget was around $30 billion in 2019. It’s now over $40 billion in 2024; yet, the Legislature rarely looks at making actual changes that will return money to citizens or at least save them money on the front end. Add to that all of the bills that further chip away our TABOR refunds that are owed to us, and we have even less spare income. Simply put, cut spending and let people keep more of their money if you want to help them.

LUPO: Cut taxes, it is a very simple solution that has proven effective for generations. Putting more money back in the budget of Coloradans is the fastest, most effective way of boosting the economy and easing the pain of rising inflation. This combined with reducing illegal immigration, reducing the social services budget and holding K-12 and higher education fiscally responsible will make a substantial impact. I also will fight to end the use of terms like “Without increasing taxes” on ballot measures which would allow local municipalities to keep taxes in place that were scheduled to sunset.

Do you support deeper property tax cuts through ballot initiatives this year that would override the Legislature’s property tax work from the most recent session?

CALDWELL: Absolutely. I’m supportive of initiatives like Initiative 50 and other proposals from the Advance Colorado Institute. We should cap our annual increases and provide a rollback to 2022 levels. Most constituents in my district, including myself, have experienced anywhere from a 30% increase or higher in our property tax bills in a very short time. It’s not only hurting those on fixed incomes but also renters who are having their rents raised to cover the added cost to landlords.

Those opposing such measures will claim the state budget can’t afford that kind of tax cut. As I mentioned before, we have record-level budgets that have ballooned in just the last five years. It’s not a tax revenue problem. It’s a prioritization and spending problem.

LUPO: Yes, homeowners are seeing up to 54% increases in property tax over a three year period in the midst of record inflation. More has to be done to curb this extremely harmful tax. Legislators need to curb their spending on issues that only increase government’s reach and produce no valuable benefit in the lives of Coloradans.

Many Coloradans are listing their top issue this election year as democracy and good governance through the statewide Voter Voices project. Do you find any common ground with members of the opposite party, and how important is bipartisanship in your political philosophy?

CALDWELL: The Founders designed our system with gridlock in mind, while at the same time understanding that it would force working together to get good legislation passed through both legislative chambers and the executive branch. If there is legislation that will positively benefit HD20 residents and other Coloradans, I will certainly work across the aisle in a bipartisan way to get it accomplished.

There’s on average over 600 bills a year introduced in the Colorado Legislature. In my opinion, it’s way too much, but roughly 80% of the bills are bipartisan. I want to pass great bills like Senior Property Tax Exemption Portability, and I understand that as a minority party member, I will have to work across the aisle to make that happen. The needs of HD20 constituents come before any personal or professional animosity I may have for opposing party members.

It’s important to note that I will fight just as hard against bills that go against my conservative principles and the interests of HD20 residents. I will work together with my Democrat colleagues on good bills that help HD20, but I will also fight like Hell against the bad ones.

LUPO: I am willing to find common ground on legislation that does not infringe on the constitutional rights of Americans, does not increase government overreach, does not reduce families’ abilities to practice their own faith and uphold their values and does not harm the pocketbooks of Coloradans or local economies.

House District 21 includes southern parts of El Paso County including Fort Carson, Fountain and unincorporated areas west of Interstate 25. Incumbent Rep. Mary Bradfield, a Republican running for a third term, won with about 58% of the vote in 2022.

Koester did not return a response. 

If elected, what would be your top three priorities during the 2025 legislative session?

BRADFIELD: My three priorities are: (1) Finish the bill HB24-1237 — Community Programs for Child Care. Money was not available for Phase 2 and 3. (2) Very actively work against bills that are not good for the people of my district and Colorado. (3) Insure that the tax credit for retired military is continued forever.

GARLINGTON: (1) Elimination of Colorado State Income Tax  (2) Removal of all Sanctuary Cities in CO (16) currently (3) Fund police and Tough on Crime along with reducing excessive gun legislation 

What do residents in your district say is the community’s biggest issue, and how will you work to address it?

BRADFIELD: My community is fed up with pot holes in the roads and streets. Not sure that I can help with that, but will work with community and county leaders to find solutions/money. The second that I hear is inflation. I will fight even harder for reducing fees and will oppose any new fees.

GARLINGTON: Guns laws, meaning they want less gun legislation and more freedom, which I support. No universal background checks, stand your ground laws, open and carry without permits and removal of the word assault weapons, which means nothing.

The Legislature passed a few key land use bills this year aimed at increasing housing development. What is the state’s role, if any, to increase development and density to address the affordable housing stock issue?

BRADFIELD: Several of the land use bills passed were dealing with creating population dense communities where the use of public transportation is the only option. I do not believe that creating multiple dwellings in a small space will add any quality of life or affordability. Instead, allow the local governments to create their own zoning and development plans. Every community has a need for more affordable housing, and each community’s needs are different.

GARLINGTON: Government subsidies with developers through lobbyist is a scam. Government funding when it comes to builders wanting to build for Section 8 housing or other means of housing for the poor should be funded through private enterprise and not the government whether it be federal or state.

What is the state’s role in mitigating the effects of climate change on citizens and what specific environmental policies would you support in the Legislature?

BRADFIELD: First, I do believe that climate is changing. I do wish the majority party would be open to participate in discussions from different perspectives. I would support initiatives that eliminate dangerous “forever” chemicals from consumer products which are getting into water supplies and are now harming humans, animals, and plants.

GARLINGTON: I do not support this climate change directive. None. The state needs to stay out of this issue. First it was global warming. Then the earth was cooling. Now it is climate change. The climate changes by the minute, and this sort of legislation from those who desire governmental assistance is another money making scam. Our tax dollars should provide for those in the present and stop wasting taxpayer money while lining the pockets of these governmental officials who are becoming wealthy on the backside of the people. Less government all around.

How can the Legislature most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for Coloradans across all backgrounds, including income levels and homeowner/renter status?

BRADFIELD: The elimination of many fees that people pay would be a big help. State government should tighten its belt and do more with less. Lower property taxes would help home and business owners. Less regulation and penalties for the building industry. Allow the energy resources Colorado has in abundance to be used at a reasonable rate. Allow industry to police itself. The medical field is quite capable of promoting healthy policies without the government’s managing and taxing.

GARLINGTON: Stop the waste on governmental programs within the state like (funding healthcare for illegals and non-producers). Bring criminals to justice for stealing from local establishments. Begin producing energy, while cutting or eliminating certain taxes (state income tax and property taxes) so that more businesses and citizens will want to move to Colorado and become a magnet for success.

Do you support deeper property tax cuts through ballot initiatives this year that would override the Legislature’s property tax work from the most recent session?

BRADFIELD: Property taxes should be reduced. A ballot initiative sounds good, but so often the question on the ballot is written in such confusing and conflicting language that the ordinary citizen will not understand. The ballot initiative probably should read that the state legislature must reduce taxes by ___ amount within ___ years. If not, taxes will revert to (some year) level.

GARLINGTON: My stance on property taxes is they need to be cut and maintained without increase for a period of four years. Secondly, any homeowner or business owner who has paid off the loan or mortgage should have no property tax. The elderly who work all their life to pay off their home find themselves stuck on a fixed income and cannot afford the increased property tax. They are forced to sell or lose their home and it’s not fair. Plus, those citizens cannot deduct their interest on their paid-off home. Double whammy. Lastly, an overall homestead exemption for anyone who buys a home, we can start with $25,000 off the property taxes each year. We do it in Florida and it can become a magnet for Colorado.

Many Coloradans are listing their top issue this election year as democracy and good governance through the statewide Voter Voices project. Do you find any common ground with members of the opposite party, and how important is bipartisanship in your political philosophy?

BRADFIELD: I believe that bipartisanship is the only way to have really good legislation. This means that there is the willingness to compromise on both sides. No one party has all the best ideas or solutions. I have been fortunate to work with several legislators on the other side of the aisle that believe as I do. Bipartisanship is the way to give the best to ALL Coloradans.

GARLINGTON: As an elected representative I will always be open to discussion on the issues of the other political party, as well as my own political party. I will never stay close-minded on any subject. This includes guns, property, taxes, abortion and illegal immigration issues. I will always listen, then provide my reasons on the issue and try to find common ground. The role of any elected politician is what is best for most of its citizens in a community, state, or nation.

What is one bill, vote or other legislative action you’ve taken that you feel best demonstrates your qualification for reelection?

BRADFIELD: I base my qualification for reelection on what have I done thus far for the people of my district and all of Colorado. Please forgive me, but I must list three bills I am proud of what they are doing for Colorado.

HB21-1134 — Report on time payment of rent to credit bureaus with the intent to raise credit scores. This program is still in effect and the results are so positive. Nearly everyone in this programs have significantly raised credit scores and are on a positive path to financial responsibility.
HB23-1084 — Colorado income tax deduction for retired military personnel. This bill especially helps many in my district.
HB23-1071 — Licensed psychologist ability to prescribe medication for the treatment of mental health disorders. In order for the psychologist to earn this credential, he/she must complete and pass rigorous education, testing, and practicum. This bill is not an immediate solution, but a positive one for the future.

Are there any votes the incumbent has taken in the Legislature you disagree with?

GARLINGTON: My opponent had a 55% liberty score card on conservative Republican issues. She is next to last as a state legislator on conservative issues siding with the Democrats 45% of the time. She does not represent HD21’s conservative voice here in Colorado. I will crush that low % when it comes to conservative principles and legislation, by “Making Colorado Red Again.”  Her voting record speaks for itself for the last four years.

House District 43 encompasses Highlands Ranch. It is currently represented by Democratic Rep. Bob Marshall, who won with just over 50% of the vote in 2020.

Burcham did not return a response.

If elected, what would be your top three priorities during the 2025 legislative session?

THOMAS: Public safety, affordability, property taxes

What do residents in your district say is the community’s biggest issue, and how will you work to address it?

THOMAS: Property taxes and the high cost of living. The constant growth of government and its high costs continue to increase the cost of goods, services, and housing.

The Legislature passed a few key land use bills this year aimed at increasing housing development. What is the state’s role, if any, to increase development and density to address the affordable housing stock issue?

THOMAS: As a current county commissioner, I know that land use decisions belong at the local level and not dictated by the state. Unfunded mandates by the state add to the cost of government, which is ultimately paid for by our citizens. Unnecessary and costly conflicts are created when the state creates laws that interfere with local zoning regulations already in place.

What is the state’s role in mitigating the effects of climate change on citizens and what specific environmental policies would you support in the Legislature?

THOMAS: The emphasis placed on an environmentalist agenda has increased the cost of living for those struggling to maintain their current quality of life. I’ve been watching the Front Range Passenger Rail conversation that is already adding fees to fund this project that is costly and not viable. Have we learned nothing from the limited success of previous/current costly RTD projects?

How can the Legislature most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for Coloradans across all backgrounds, including income levels and homeowner/renter status?

THOMAS: The Legislature needs to stop expanding government control and adding regulations that increase the costs of goods and services people need. For example, crushing and unnecessary construction regulations add five figures to the base cost of new homes, which are becoming increasingly out-of-reach for new families.

Do you support deeper property tax cuts through ballot initiatives this year that would override the Legislature’s property tax work from the most recent session?

THOMAS: Since Gallagher was repealed in 2020, the people of this state have begged, pleaded and demanded the General Assembly to fix the residential property formula that everyone knew would result in a property tax crisis. Only in the last three days of the 2023 general session was SB23-303 passed, which led to HH that was soundly defeated because voters saw through the bait-and-switch to steal their TABOR refunds. The voters’ message was clear — fix the property tax crisis WITHOUT RAIDING TABOR!

Instead of bringing stakeholders together in 2024 for a conversation to address the still-too-high property taxes paid in 2024, once again a last-minute effort yielded some action, albeit too little, too late. Now two groups are talking about bringing forward ballot initiatives that will put severe limits on property tax growth. As a county commissioner, I KNOW the severe consequences of capping the budget at 4% + growth will have on expected services. Douglas County is planning for these initiatives to pass, and I hope others are as well. The residents of the Colorado have run out of patience with our state government. This isn’t about what I support, but what the citizens of Colorado are going to say at the polls in November.

Many Coloradans are listing their top issue this election year as democracy and good governance through the statewide Voter Voices project. Do you find any common ground with members of the opposite party, and how important is bipartisanship in your political philosophy?

THOMAS: As the elected secretary of the statewide organization of County Commissioners, CCI (Colorado Counties Inc), I have been building bridges with Democrat, Republican and Unaffiliated commissioners for years, to work through the important issues facing our communities. Bipartisanship has long been a part of my governing strategy and it will continue to be as a member of the State Legislature.

House District 45 is centered in Castle Rock. Current Rep. Lisa Frizell, a Republican, won the seat with about 62% of the vote in 2022.

Neither Brooks nor Jack returned a response.

House District 46 is centered in Pueblo and includes western parts of the county, also stretching east toward Avondale. Incumbent Rep. Tisha Mauro, a Democrat running for reelection, won the seat with 54% of the vote in 2022.

Swearingen did not return a response.

If elected, what would be your top three priorities during the 2025 legislative session?

What do residents in your district say is the community’s biggest issue, and how will you work to address it?

How can the Legislature most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for Coloradans across all backgrounds, including income levels and homeowner/renter status?

Do you support deeper property tax cuts through ballot initiatives this year that would override the Legislature’s property tax work from the most recent session?

Many Coloradans are listing their top issue this election year as democracy and good governance through the statewide Voter Voices project. Do you find any common ground with members of the opposite party, and how important is bipartisanship in your political philosophy?

House District 58 is centered in Montrose and stretches east to include Gunnison, south to include Telluride and goes west to the border with Utah. Rep. Marc Catlin, a Republican now running for a state Senate seat, won reelection to the seat with about 57% of the vote in 2022.

Neither Roeber nor Suckla returned a response.

House District 63 starts just east of Fort Collins and Greeley and continues east to include Fort Morgan and Sterling, going all the way to the eastern border with Nebraska and Kansas. Rep. Richard Holtorf, a Republican running in the primary to represent the 4th Congressional District, won the seat unanimously after running unopposed in 2022.

Urdiales did not return a response.

If elected, what would be your top three priorities during the 2025 legislative session?

JOHNSON:

Support Agriculture: One of the best ways to bridge the rural-urban divide is through education and outreach efforts.
Advocate for Rural Communities: We may have a smaller population, but that does not mean our services (roads, broadband, medical resources, housing, etc.) should be neglected.
Common Sense Water Planning: It starts with making sure we have a solid understanding about Colorado’s water rights (Prior Appropriation System) and educating about all our water resources — not just the Colorado River.
Accountable Healthcare Reform: There is a strong need for more services for both physical and mental health.
Founding Principles: Sometimes the most effective legislative leaders are not those who make and pass bills, but those who can limit the bills being passed and reduce government encroachment into our personal lives and business. As a strong supporter of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution, I promise to fight for and protect our inalienable rights.

What do residents in your district say is the community’s biggest issue, and how will you work to address it?

JOHNSON: The biggest issue in HD63, and our state, is the urban-rural divide because there is a lack of education on where food comes from along with a lack of resources for our smaller populated areas. Our farmers and ranchers are the best stewards of the land and the best at animal husbandry. However, our ag sector is heavily regulated with burdensome taxes/fees because many do not understand the food supply chain or what it takes to be in production agriculture. Our urban families want healthy food options at affordable prices. Our rural communities are also underserved as money is allocated based on population.

I am a proud Republican, but “R is for Rural.” Our issues in Colorado are economic-based and the discussion should not be about party, but about the people across our state and how what works for some will not work for others. I plan to come to the table to not only share a meal with all my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, but to also talk about policy. I will work on educating those in urban districts about agricultural and rural communities, while also recognizing I will need to be educated about urban issues.

The Legislature passed a few key land use bills this year aimed at increasing housing development. What is the state’s role, if any, to increase development and density to address the affordable housing stock issue

JOHNSON: In Colorado, we must put affordable back into affordable housing. This means that we need to deregulate a lot of what our state has already done (like mandating extra coding rules to require electric charging sites) and fight against what they are currently doing (adding more protections for tenants and punishments on housing providers). We also need to recognize that housing is a chain of life events (in theory and on average as not everyone hits every stage of this cycle): the first home, the moving up in life or just got married home, the home to expand for a family, and the retirement home. We need to look at the market in terms of opening up housing at all of these stages so that people can move up or down in their housing needs.

Housing should remain in the private sector (away from the public sector and government overreach). I believe strongly in capitalism and that the market should remain free without force so it can fluctuate as needed based on supply and demand.

What is the state’s role in mitigating the effects of climate change on citizens and what specific environmental policies would you support in the Legislature?

JOHNSON: Our farmers and ranchers are the best stewards of the land, overregulation only serves to make it harder for them to operate and more expensive to buy their products in stores (meaning food prices go up). I would like to believe that we all want to do what is common sense practice for the good of the environment, the issue is that common sense is lacking and/or can be argued about what it means and how to go about it … adding extra regulations onto our business owners (and in turn our consumers) has only had negative consequences. The best policies come from choice, not force. Let the people drive the market, and if they want companies who are going after green initiatives, then those are the businesses that will succeed.

How can the Legislature most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for Coloradans across all backgrounds, including income levels and homeowner/renter status?

JOHNSON: The Legislature can most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for all Coloradans by supporting and deregulating the industries that are major economic drivers in and for our state — agriculture and the oil and gas sector. We need to make it easier for businesses to open and operate in our state. We should work on getting rid of overburdensome regulations and less taxes/fees in Colorado as this would help businesses prosper and consumers would have more choices in our state.

Do you support deeper property tax cuts through ballot initiatives this year that would override the Legislature’s property tax work from the most recent session?

JOHNSON: We are living in a very volatile market right now when it comes to property prices. State government should have never overstepped last year, and we should have pushed stronger for local control; however, the cat is out of the bag and we cannot add more regulation on what has already been over-regulated. Prices will not fix themselves overnight and we need to understand that whatever “solution” is passed or voted on will take time to be implemented and sort itself out in terms of market stability.

I support the will of the people if Coloradans wish to pass a ballot initiative to cut property taxes more. With that said, I would just urge caution about how many “fixes” we are offering and how fast, because we need to allow the market some time to adjust to what has already been done. We also need to be mindful that everything has a consequence, good or bad. These higher property tax rates have supported the budgets of many of our special hospital and fire districts. I am a strong advocate for reducing our taxes, but we must do so in a way that is responsible and gradual.

Many Coloradans are listing their top issue this election year as democracy and good governance through the statewide Voter Voices project. Do you find any common ground with members of the opposite party, and how important is bipartisanship in your political philosophy?

JOHNSON:We need common-sense plans and strategies that are people-driven and push back on the thinking that government is the answer. Having worked as a staffer and legislative aide for a U.S. congressman and three state senators, I bring eight years of political experience to the table. I have learned how to recognize the political games that are played, the value in bridging relationships on all sides to get work done, and the importance of having stakeholders at the table (because if anyone ever thinks they are the smartest in the room, the room is skewed). The best ideas come when we unite and are willing to make connections that are grown by mutual respect and the honor of our word. We all have a common grand in that we all need to come to the table to eat, so let’s all come to the table to talk about policy matters.

House District 65 encompasses towns north and east of Fort Collins including Wellington and Windsor, stretching east to Eaton and south down Interstate 25. Rep. Mike Lynch, a Republican running in the primary to represent the 4th Congressional District, won reelection in 2022 with about 62% of the vote.

Garcia Sander did not return a response.

If elected, what would be your top three priorities during the 2025 legislative session?

LEISY: There are many priorities that need to be address in the next legislative session. Unleashing the full potential of our economy. Protecting our Second Amendment rights. Addressing the illegal immigration crises. Protect our children. End human trafficking. Reduce environmental regulations across Colorado. Protect law enforcement and allow them to do their job. Protecting our water.

What do residents in your district say is the community’s biggest issue, and how will you work to address it?

LEISY: When I am talking to voters in House District 65 they believe the biggest issues they are facing is the economy, immigration, water and safety and security. In order to address the economic hardship Coloradans are facing, then unleash the full potential of the economy. In order to address the immigration crises in Colorado, then stop accepting illegals into Colorado by the bus loads. Stop cutting resources to pay for illegals in Colorado. Reducing illegal immigration in Colorado will decrease crime and drugs. In order to address this issue we are facing with water then we need to address the billions of acre feet flowing out of Colorado that rightfully belongs here. Create more storage for water while still protecting personal property rights. Communities need to tie development to water and not allow development to occur if the developer doesn’t bring the water needed for their project. Cash in lieu programs are only hurting communities throughout Colorado because when they actually do need water it will cost communities more in the long run which will only increase taxes in the communities to pay for water. In order to address safety and security then the state needs to allow law enforcement to do their job. Currently law enforcement is underfunded and understaffed due to the anti-law enforcement legislation that has been signed into law. This has created a gap in safety as they are not able to fully do their job. This creates an increase in lawlessness in communities across the state.

The Legislature passed a few key land use bills this year aimed at increasing housing development. What is the state’s role, if any, to increase development and density to address the affordable housing stock issue?

LEISY: Affordable housing has been hijacked by both parties throughout the years. What does affordable housing even mean these days? I do not believe the proper role of the government is to make housing “affordable” by controlling the marketplace. SB24-174 which has been signed into law will prove to be disastrous for every community across Colorado. It creates a significant financial burden with small and rural communities which will force them to raise taxes to pay for “sustainable affordable housing assistance.” Every community will be faced with increasing taxes to offset this assistance. I would support working with developers, builders, and lenders to incentivize new and existing home buyers within a certain income bracket to qualify and purchase a home. If “affordable” meant that low-income residents can purchase a home and have some buy in, then I would be in favor of helping those individuals achieve their dream of purchasing homes. I will not support any legislation that just drops low-income housing into any community where the occupants have no buy in. Historically “affordable” housing results in apartment complexes that are forced into communities across the state that only increase drugs and crime. No community should be forced to put an undue financial burden on them just because the state legislatures think it’s a good idea to drop “affordable” housing in a community they know nothing about. If our economy was unleashed to its full potential there would be no need for massive “affordable” housing.

What is the state’s role in mitigating the effects of climate change on citizens and what specific environmental policies would you support in the Legislature?

LEISY: Climate occurs four times a year in Colorado, other than that climate change is a hoax. Time and time again we see our state legislatures over-tax and over-regulate in the name of “climate change.” This creates a burden on every Coloradan across this great state. We are experiencing this on the national level as well. Our cost-of-living has increased significantly over the years as we see more and more useless legislation passed and signed into law that only creates more regulations and higher taxes. As the next representative to District 65 I will stand against any legislation that is designed to hurt everyday Coloradans all in the name of “climate change.” We should all be good stewards of the land and do our part to keep it clean and functional. We drill for natural resources cleaner and more efficient than ever before. Continue those practices and we will have a thriving climate. We should never be in a position to destroy our economy to make some environmental lobby group feel good. Unleash our economy!

How can the Legislature most effectively address cost-of-living concerns for Coloradans across all backgrounds, including income levels and homeowner/renter status?

LEISY: It is simple, unleash the full potential of the economy in Colorado which will in turn reduce the cost-of-living. Couple that with reducing stringent regulations in every sector of the marketplace. Over regulation only chokes our economy and hurts every Coloradan across all backgrounds. As the next state representative to District 65, I will work tirelessly to unleash our economy as well as work to cut regulations to allow our economy to flourish. Colorado is ranked in the bottom half of the states in the U.S. when it comes to our economy and economic growth. We should always be striving to have the Number One economy which will in turn attract more small businesses and corporations to Colorado. That will bolster the workforce and drive the cost-of-living down so every demographic will proper.

Do you support deeper property tax cuts through ballot initiatives this year that would override the Legislature’s property tax work from the most recent session?

LEISY: I am the only candidate in this race who has voted to reduce property tax in Weld County. As a Weld County Councilman for District 1 I led the charge to reduce the Weld County mill levy rate which returned $78.5 million to the taxpayers and was successful in doing so. Every property taxpayer in Weld County experienced a reduction in property tax specific to the Weld County mill levy assessment because of this. I am a proponent of the reduction of any tax on any level. I will strongly support any initiative that reduces taxes so long as there isn’t an increase in taxes somewhere else to “backfill” a deficit by the reduction in property taxes. The current state Legislature, as well as previous ones, have replaced the word “tax” with “fee.” I will not support any increase in fees to offset the reduction of any tax.

Many Coloradans are listing their top issue this election year as democracy and good governance through the statewide Voter Voices project. Do you find any common ground with members of the opposite party, and how important is bipartisanship in your political philosophy?

LEISY: What we are experiencing today is not Republican vs. Democrats. It is good vs evil. We are in the midst of a spiritual warfare. With the Republicans having the smallest minority in the history of Colorado we can no longer afford to just give the opposite party whatever they want all in the name of “compromise” or “making a deal.” The Republicans have negotiated the “middle” away which has been fully hijacked by the opposite party. If elected, I will be an effective fighter. I will always stand on principle. I will never negotiate your constitutional rights and conservative principles away. I will stand firm against any legislation that will hurt Coloradans. I will work to find middle ground that we can work together on so long as it doesn’t hurt Colorado. It is time that we have representatives who can fight, stand strong and firm, and be an effective leader. All of which I am. Colorado is my home, and I want to protect my home from those who are out to destroy the very essence of Colorado. Let’s work together to find meaningful bipartisanship that will work for everyone.

The post Voter guide 2024: Republican state House primary races Q&A appeared first on Colorado Newsline.